For our book chat members, the content of this detailed Bryn Mawr Classical Review of the German publication Römisch-germanische Begegnung in der späten Republik und frühen
Kaiserzeit. Voraussetzungen-Konfrontationen-Wirkungen. Gesammelte
Studien by Dieter Timpe, 2006, should be of interest, given last Wednesday's discussion.
(my translation of the title: Roman-Germanic Encounters in the Late Republic and Early Principate)
[…] In his introduction (3-18), T. explains the impossibility of writing
straightforward 'Germanic' history, principally because 'Germani' is a
Roman construct. There was never an ancient, independent and self-aware
Germanic 'nation', viscerally opposed to the Roman Empire, only middle
and northern Europeans messily but positively interacting with their
southern neighbours -- Celts, then Romans. T. argues that Rome's
dealings with the northern barbarians are obscured by the paucity of
the sources and their propensity to distort what they describe
according to their own experiences and expectations.
[…] T.'s main themes are easy to recognise. Historiographically, he
stresses that most of our sources, preferring preconception over
experience, seriously misinform us about Germanic affairs. Their
projection of an absolute polarity between 'Germanentum' and 'Römertum'
played a crucial role in shaping German nationalism, which remains an
embarrassment for contemporary German historians. However, their
misinformation may be corrected by assessing what they say against the
wider geographical and historical context. Historically, he is equally
keen to assert that, contrary to the sources, in their practical
dealings Romans and Germani were generally cooperative. His 'big idea'
is certainly that under different circumstances Rome could have
provincialised Germania, and that what determined otherwise was the
emergence of an axis of Suebian power up the Elbe.
read all
Hat tip: Adrian Murdoch
Recent Comments